January 2025 • 10 min read
reCAPTCHA v3 vs v2: Complete Developer Guide
Everything developers need to know about Google reCAPTCHA versions. Compare implementation methods, security features, use cases, and learn how to solve both versions programmatically with AI4CAP.COM's API.
Google's reCAPTCHA has evolved significantly from the traditional "I'm not a robot" checkbox (v2) to the invisible, score-based system (v3). As a developer, choosing the right version and implementing it correctly is crucial for both security and user experience. Let's dive deep into the differences and best practices.
Quick Tip: Both reCAPTCHA versions can be solved programmatically using AI4CAP.COM's API, making automated testing and web scraping possible while maintaining compliance.
Quick Comparison Overview
Feature | reCAPTCHA v2 | reCAPTCHA v3 |
---|---|---|
User Interaction | Checkbox or image challenges | No interaction (invisible) |
Implementation | Simple, drop-in widget | Requires backend verification |
User Experience | Can interrupt flow | Seamless, no friction |
Bot Detection | Binary (human/bot) | Score-based (0.0-1.0) |
Best For | High-security actions | Overall site protection |
AI4CAP Price | $0.01 per solve | $0.02 per solve |
reCAPTCHA v2: The Interactive Approach
How It Works
reCAPTCHA v2 presents users with an explicit challenge - either clicking a checkbox or solving image-based puzzles. It uses advanced risk analysis to determine when to show challenges.
Implementation Example
<!-- HTML -->
<form action="/submit" method="POST">
<div class="g-recaptcha"
data-sitekey="YOUR_SITE_KEY"
data-callback="onSuccess"
data-expired-callback="onExpired">
</div>
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>
<script>
function onSuccess(token) {
console.log('reCAPTCHA solved:', token);
// Enable form submission
}
function onExpired() {
console.log('reCAPTCHA expired');
grecaptcha.reset();
}
</script>
<!-- Load reCAPTCHA -->
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js" async defer></script>
Backend Verification
// Node.js/Express backend verification
app.post('/submit', async (req, res) => {
const token = req.body['g-recaptcha-response'];
const response = await fetch('https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' },
body: `secret=YOUR_SECRET_KEY&response=${token}`
});
const data = await response.json();
if (data.success) {
// Process form submission
res.json({ success: true });
} else {
res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid reCAPTCHA' });
}
});
Pros
- ✓ High security for critical actions
- ✓ Clear user feedback
- ✓ Simple implementation
- ✓ Works without JavaScript modifications
Cons
- ✗ Interrupts user flow
- ✗ Can frustrate legitimate users
- ✗ Accessibility concerns
- ✗ May reduce conversion rates
reCAPTCHA v3: The Invisible Guardian
How It Works
reCAPTCHA v3 runs in the background, analyzing user behavior to generate a score between 0.0 (likely bot) and 1.0 (likely human). You decide what to do based on the score.
Implementation Example
<!-- Load reCAPTCHA v3 -->
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=YOUR_SITE_KEY"></script>
<script>
// Execute on page load
grecaptcha.ready(function() {
// Execute for specific action
grecaptcha.execute('YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: 'homepage'})
.then(function(token) {
// Send token to backend with form data
document.getElementById('recaptchaToken').value = token;
});
});
// Execute on form submission
function onSubmit(e) {
e.preventDefault();
grecaptcha.execute('YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: 'submit'})
.then(function(token) {
// Include token in form submission
const formData = new FormData(e.target);
formData.append('recaptcha_token', token);
fetch('/api/submit', {
method: 'POST',
body: formData
});
});
}
</script>
// Node.js/Express backend with score handling
app.post('/api/submit', async (req, res) => {
const token = req.body.recaptcha_token;
// Verify with Google
const response = await fetch('https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' },
body: `secret=YOUR_SECRET_KEY&response=${token}`
});
const data = await response.json();
if (data.success) {
const score = data.score;
const action = data.action;
// Implement your logic based on score
if (score >= 0.7) {
// High confidence - process normally
processForm(req.body);
} else if (score >= 0.3) {
// Medium confidence - maybe require email verification
sendVerificationEmail(req.body.email);
} else {
// Low confidence - block or require additional verification
res.status(403).json({ error: 'Suspicious activity detected' });
}
}
});
Understanding reCAPTCHA v3 Scores
Score Range | Interpretation | Recommended Action |
---|---|---|
0.7 - 1.0 | Very likely human | Allow action |
0.3 - 0.7 | Uncertain | Additional verification |
0.0 - 0.3 | Very likely bot | Block or challenge |
Best Practices for v3 Actions
Good Action Names
- • login
- • signup
- • checkout
- • contact_form
- • password_reset
Implementation Tips
- • Use descriptive action names
- • Execute on user interactions
- • Monitor score distributions
- • Adjust thresholds based on data
- • Implement fallback mechanisms
Decision Guide: Which Version to Choose?
Use reCAPTCHA v2 When:
- High-stakes actions: Payment processing, account creation for sensitive services
- Clear bot prevention needed: When you need explicit confirmation that the user is human
- Simple implementation: Quick to implement without backend modifications
- One-time actions: Password resets, contact forms
Use reCAPTCHA v3 When:
- Site-wide protection: Monitor all user interactions without friction
- User experience priority: When you can't afford to interrupt user flow
- Adaptive security: Different responses based on risk levels
- Analytics needed: Track bot patterns and behaviors
Solving Both Versions with AI4CAP.COM
Whether you're testing your implementation or need to automate interactions with reCAPTCHA-protected sites, AI4CAP.COM provides reliable solutions for both versions.
// Solve reCAPTCHA v2 with AI4CAP.COM
const response = await fetch('https://api.ai4cap.com/api/captcha/solve', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'X-API-KEY': 'your-api-key',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({
type: 'recaptcha_v2',
siteKey: '6Le-wvkSAAAAAPBMRTvw0Q4Muexq9bi0DJwx_mJ-',
pageUrl: 'https://example.com/form'
})
});
const { taskId } = await response.json();
// Poll for result (usually 10-15 seconds)
const solution = await pollForResult(taskId);
console.log('Token:', solution.gRecaptchaResponse);
// Solve reCAPTCHA v3 with AI4CAP.COM
const response = await fetch('https://api.ai4cap.com/api/captcha/solve', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'X-API-KEY': 'your-api-key',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({
type: 'recaptcha_v3',
siteKey: '6LfD3PIbAAAAAJS7yFx8391s',
pageUrl: 'https://example.com',
action: 'submit', // Important: match the action
minScore: 0.7 // Minimum score required
})
});
// v3 typically solves faster (5-10 seconds)
const solution = await pollForResult(response.taskId);
console.log('Token:', solution.gRecaptchaResponse);
Migrating from v2 to v3
Many developers are moving from v2 to v3 for better user experience. Here's a migration checklist:
- 1. Backend Changes: Implement score-based logic instead of binary pass/fail
- 2. Frontend Updates: Remove visible widgets, add background execution
- 3. Analytics Setup: Track score distributions to optimize thresholds
- 4. Fallback Strategy: Implement v2 as fallback for low scores
- 5. Testing: Use AI4CAP.COM to test both implementations
Final Recommendations
Both reCAPTCHA versions have their place in modern web applications:
For most sites: Use v3 for general protection and v2 as a fallback for suspicious activity
For high-security: Implement v2 on critical actions while using v3 for monitoring
For testing: Always test CAPTCHA implementations with automated tools like AI4CAP.COM to ensure they work correctly
Written by the AI4CAP Development Team